Sorry... I forgot to mention that.... IE9. I must be doing something different. The example they have works fine: http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap/examples/hero.html Thanks! Thiago.
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 1:09 PM, dsh <[email protected]> wrote: > Which IE version? > > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Thiago Veronezi <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > I've changed the style of some of the webapp pages: "Index", "JNDI", > "EJB" > > and "Class". > > I still need to change the style of the "Invoker" page, but I will need > to > > do it later today, or tomorrow [ most probably - today is "Friday", you > > know :O) ] > > > > I already know that the new style does not play well in IE. I would > > appreciate a little help to figure out why IE does not like it. Also, > feel > > free to change what you don't like. I don't have a good taste in styles. > > :O) > > > > []s, > > Thiago. > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: Jonathan Gallimore <[email protected]> > > Date: Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 7:42 AM > > Subject: Re: Final release > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > +1 for a new release. Let me know if I can help with anything on the UI. > > > > Jon > > > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Thiago Veronezi <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> Yeap. > >> I will try it tonight. Not exactly what I wanted, but I can live with > > that. > >> :O) I will definitively need more time for the new interface, but we can > >> have a quick path for the current one. > >> []s, > >> Thiago. > >> > >> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > [email protected] > >> >wrote: > >> > >> > We can simply skin the old one and release a 1.1.0 quickly, no? > >> > > >> > - Romain > >> > > >> > Le 4 avr. 2012 04:58, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> a > écrit > >> : > >> > > >> > > > >> > > On Apr 3, 2012, at 6:34 PM, Thiago Veronezi wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > Hmmm... the new web interface is still on its way. I didn't have > > much > >> > > time > >> > > > since my last commit due to some last minute issues in my project. > >> > > > > >> > > > The new interface has no priority (we really just want to see the > >> ejbs > >> > > > running :O) ). Also, I don't want this new web interface in a > final > >> > > > release. It should pass by the beta version first. So I think we > are > >> OK > >> > > for > >> > > > a new release. > >> > > > >> > > The old interface is pretty bad. Do you have any thoughts on some > > very > >> > > stripped down version of the new interface might be good for a > final? > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > -David > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Here is my +1 > >> > > > > >> > > > []s, > >> > > > Thiago. > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO < > >> > [email protected] > >> > > >wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > >> Hehe, > >> > > >> > >> > > >> +1 as well for a release and of course for a TomEE 1.0.0 / > OpenEJB > >> > > 4.0.0 > >> > > >> > >> > > >> Jean-Louis > >> > > >> > >> > > >> Le 3 avril 2012 22:16, Neale Rudd <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> > > >> > >> > > >>> Very good point. In our tests here, especially since you added > > the > >> > > >>> "missing WEB-INF/web.xml" change, it's ready to go. > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> So logo or not, +1 on a 1.0.0 > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> Best Regards, > >> > > >>> Neale > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> >
