Note that this is not for now... I am just playing with the idea Romain had. []s, Thiago.
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Thiago Veronezi <[email protected]>wrote: > I just created a window that gives access to the JavaScript (Rhino) engine > at the server side. > Basically, the user can send a JS code to the server. The code will have > the response and the request instances, so the user can lookup a bean and > execute one of its methods from a web page. > > Here is the code: http://people.apache.org/~tveronezi/ConsoleServlet.java > Here is how to create a JS for it: > http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/guides/scripting/programmer_guide/index.html > > It seems really dangerous! Do you think that limiting the access to > localhost and adding servlet security is enough? Do you think I should add > this feature at all? > > []s, > Thiago. > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> 1) yes exactly >> 2) was mainly thinking of simple things like pages to show friendly wsdl >> and wadl, but it can be done manually too >> >> - Romain >> >> >> 2012/4/10 Thiago Veronezi <[email protected]> >> >> > Hi Romain, >> > >> > 1) What do you mean by console? Do you mean something like the grails >> > console? http://grails.org/plugin/console >> > It seems interesting. >> > >> > 2) I am not a big fan of code generation. I like more the JSON approach >> > (from this thread >> > >> > >> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Various-TomEE-improvements-td4343090.html >> > ). >> > I was focusing on that with a js webapp that can easily support mobile >> > browsers. >> > >> > >> > []s, >> > Thiago. >> > >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau >> > <[email protected]>wrote: >> > >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > that's not the moment (because of the coming release) but i had some >> idea >> > > regarding our gui and want to share it before forgetting ;) >> > > >> > > 1) why not replacing our invocation flow by a console (a bit like the >> > > common-cli module we have -> you type what you want to do)? >> > > 2) why not using a kind of gui plugin (potentially linked to our >> > > services?), a plugin describe the corresponding gui and then we use a >> > > GUIBuilder (one implementation could be TomEEGuiBuilder) to generate >> the >> > > corresponding gui according to the used GUI (we obvioulsy thought to >> > webapp >> > > but it can be a cli one too replacing screens by prompt etc...) >> > > >> > > well, just 2 thouthgts trying to make our gui more effective and more >> > easy >> > > to maintain. >> > > >> > > IMHO it can be nice to get it for the version 4.0.0+1 >> > > >> > > wdyt? >> > > >> > > - Romain >> > > >> > >> > >
