+1, that seems great to me.

JLouis

Le 13 avril 2012 11:25, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> a écrit :

> yep that's probably the best compromise between simplicity, features,
> weight and work for the release.
>
> - Romain
>
>
> 2012/4/13 David Blevins <[email protected]>
>
> > Had a quick chat with Romain on IRC.  I proposed some kind of
> > mini-downloader for the future zip that will contain all the provisioning
> > libs.  The downloader would pull down the zip and install the libs.
> >  There'd be some sort of button/cli for doing the install.
> >
> > This means:
> >
> >  1) we can get TomEE final out quicker
> >  2) we can get this in all 3 of the servers (not just TomEE+)
> >  3) it can clearly be marked as beta allowing us to incorporate feedback
> > (we wouldn't have to treat it as stable)
> >
> > More thoughts welcome of course.
> >
> >
> > -David
> >
> > On Apr 12, 2012, at 11:35 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > -100 for 2): IMHO it is a great feature which should be part of tomee+
> > > bundle
> > > -1 to do another beta which simply means for a lot of people dont use
> me
> > > +1 to keep the way it is and simply fix potential dependencies issues
> > (asm
> > > for instance)
> > >
> > > gson is used for common cli module to output data but we probably can
> do
> > > something simpler, i think Thiago uses it too for the GUI for next
> > releases
> > > (but same note, just the info we need to keep something to do json)
> > >
> > > - Romain
> > >
> > >
> > > 2012/4/13 David Blevins <[email protected]>
> > >
> > >> Responding in a second email (wanted to keep the original data clean).
> > >>
> > >>> A asm-3.2.jar
> > >>
> > >> This is one of the libraries we intentionally repackage (xbean-asm) in
> > >> order to avoid library conflicts with other popular libs (like
> > hibernate).
> > >>
> > >> I'll have a look to see what is pulling in asm and see if it can be
> > >> removed.
> > >>
> > >>> A gson-2.1.jar
> > >>
> > >> Do we still need this?  If so we'll need it listed in all of our
> NOTICE
> > >> files for the tomee wars, tomee zips, and openejb standalone zips.
> > >>
> > >>> apache-tomee 1.0.0 plus
> > >>>
> > >>> A aether-api-1.13.1.jar
> > >>> A aether-connector-wagon-1.13.1.jar
> > >>> A aether-impl-1.13.1.jar
> > >>> A aether-spi-1.13.1.jar
> > >>> A aether-util-1.13.1.jar
> > >>> A google-collections-1.0.jar
> > >>> A httpclient-4.1.2.jar
> > >>> A httpcore-4.1.2.jar
> > >>> A jline-0.9.94.jar
> > >>> A jsoup-1.6.1.jar
> > >>> A maven-aether-provider-3.0.4.jar
> > >>> A maven-model-3.0.4.jar
> > >>> A maven-model-builder-3.0.4.jar
> > >>> A maven-repository-metadata-3.0.4.jar
> > >>> A mina-core-2.0.2.jar
> > >>> A openejb-common-cli-4.0.0.jar
> > >>> A openejb-provisionning-4.0.0.jar
> > >>> A openejb-ssh-4.0.0.jar
> > >>> A ops4j-base-lang-1.2.3.jar
> > >>> A ops4j-base-util-collections-1.2.3.jar
> > >>> A ops4j-base-util-property-1.2.3.jar
> > >>> A ops4j-base-util-xml-1.2.3.jar
> > >>> A pax-url-maven-commons-1.3.5.jar
> > >>> A plexus-classworlds-2.4.jar
> > >>> A plexus-component-annotations-1.5.5.jar
> > >>> A plexus-container-default-1.5.5.jar
> > >>> A plexus-interpolation-1.14.jar
> > >>> A plexus-utils-2.0.6.jar
> > >>> A sisu-guice-3.0.3-no_aop.jar
> > >>> A sisu-inject-bean-2.2.3.jar
> > >>> A sisu-inject-plexus-2.2.3.jar
> > >>> A slf4j-jdk14-1.6.4.jar
> > >>> A sshd-core-0.6.0.jar
> > >>> A wagon-file-2.2.jar
> > >>> A wagon-http-2.2.jar
> > >>> A wagon-http-shared4-2.2.jar
> > >>> A wagon-provider-api-2.2.jar
> > >>
> > >> This is really where we need the most discussion.  There are some
> > >> challenges:
> > >>
> > >> - 37 new libraries is a lot to legally screen (each will need NOTICE
> > file
> > >> additions and possibly a couple LICENSE additions).  This will take a
> > week
> > >> or more as everyone on the PMC is legally required to review this
> > >> information for accuracy before they can vote.
> > >> - 37 new libraries is a lot to add prior to a final with no previous
> > beta
> > >> exposure.
> > >> - 1.0 final is maybe not the best term for functionality that is
> really
> > >> an alpha or beta.
> > >> - Could apply to all distros: no easy way to add this functionality to
> > >> TomEE WebProfile or OpenEJB Standalone.
> > >>
> > >> I see two basic solutions, more are possible, but here goes:
> > >>
> > >> 1.  Leave things the way they are and hold 1.0 till all can be legally
> > >> screened.  This would be a 1.0 final feature of TomEE+ only.
> > >> 2.  Hold this functionality till it can be legally screened.  Release
> it
> > >> as an alpha or beta, possibly in the form of a zip that can be
> extracted
> > >> into a TomEE, TomEE+, or OpenEJB install.
> > >> 3.  Other (insert proposal here :)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Thoughts?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -David
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to