+1 I am fine with that bug too. It is just ugly, but it is not a blocker.
[]s, Thiago. On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Neale Rudd <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > Best Regards, > Neale > > Sent from MOTOROLA PHOTON™ > > -----Original message----- > From: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Thu, Apr 19, 2012 18:18:47 GMT+09:00 > Subject: Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 4.0.0/TomEE 1.0.0 (staging-068) > > oops forgot my +1 > > here it is > > - Romain > > > 2012/4/19 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > > > Seems fine for me. > > > > IMO the little gui bug is not blocking, we can maybe provide the patched > > file on any url to ease the update (that's just a file replace right?) > > > > - Romain > > > > > > > > 2012/4/19 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> > > > >> Legal stuff looks great. > >> I also recompile all sources (including tests) with an empty maven > >> repository. A bit long, but everything works like a charm. > >> > >> Here is my +1. > >> > >> BTW, I won't be available during the weekend to recompile and retest > >> everything deeper, so if a second vote is started, please lemme know > what > >> changed so that I can vote more quickly. > >> > >> Jean-Louis > >> > >> > >> Le 18 avril 2012 07:02, David Blevins <[email protected]> a > écrit : > >> > >> > Looks like the links were not quite right :) Need update the > template. > >> > Here is what it should have listed: > >> > > >> > SVN Tag: > >> > > >> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-4.0.0/ > >> > > >> > Maven Repo: > >> > > >> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-068 > >> > > >> > Binaries & Source: > >> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/staging-068/openejb-4.0.0/ > >> > > >> > Legal: > >> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/staging-068/legal/archives.html > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -David > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > --e89a8ff1ce1ad854c804be04a6b9- >
