While the real release is a 1.0.0 that should be fine ;) @struberg: one jpa provider per webapp should work, just add it to the webapp. At least it works with a real webapp. I dont know for jsf.
- Romain Le 22 avr. 2012 10:30, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > On Apr 22, 2012, at 1:15 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > > > For the next release candidates, could you please roll a -rc1, rc2 etc? > Doing a 1.0.0 over and over is not very maven friendly in case we like to > do a few tricks. > > Binaries where done already, but I'm not sure I understand the exact > suggestion. > > Nexus gives each staged release (release candidate) and ID and that is > used in the email, all builds and the tck run. It's called "stating-NNN" > in the tooling, but it could easily be updated to "rc-NNN", though the > number would still be whatever Nexus generates. > > If you had a different idea, feel free to elaborate. Not sure if you're > suggesting changing all the version numbers in the maven poms for each > build. That would be very hard. > > -David > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> > >> To: [email protected] > >> Cc: > >> Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 9:19 AM > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 4.0.0/TomEE 1.0.0 (staging-068) > >> > >> I don't really like to put all together. May be just adding a line to > the > >> catalina.properties would have done the trick. That's how we've more or > >> less proceeded until now to share the same tomcat binaries between > >> application instances. > >> > >> Jlouis > >> Le 22 avr. 2012 09:14, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> > >> a écrit : > >> > >>> > >>> On Apr 21, 2012, at 10:51 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > >>> > >>>> David, > >>>> > >>>> Does it mean that the tomee webapp is no more there or just that > >>> tomee/lib > >>>> shifted to tomcat/lib? > >>> > >>> That webapps/tomee/lib shifted to tomcat/lib > >>> > >>> No other change to the integration. > >>> > >>> > >>> -David > >>> > >>> > >>>> > >>>> Jean Louis > >>>> Le 22 avr. 2012 04:28, "David Blevins" > >> <[email protected]> a > >>> écrit : > >>>> > >>>>> Another -1 to add to the list. Attempted to get TomEE working > >> with the > >>>>> Eclipse WTP Tomcat plugin and found it near impossible. > >>>>> > >>>>> I did all the things you shouldn't do (i.e. I did it the most > >> intuitive > >>>>> way which doesn't work). Once I got it working it was a bit > >> slow. > >>> Then I > >>>>> noticed I couldn't develop any Java EE stuff because the APIs > >> weren't in > >>>>> the project. > >>>>> > >>>>> I figured out how the plugin thinks and fixed all that. Long > >> story > >>> short, > >>>>> you just need to put the server's libs in > >> <tomcat>/lib/. Did that as > >>>>> TOMEE-163. > >>>>> > >>>>> Once that is done you get several benefits: > >>>>> - Nothing special to do or avoid to get the Tomcat plugin to work > >>>>> - All the modes work fine > >>>>> - You can develop JavaEE apps without having to do any special > >> setup > >>> (the > >>>>> right libs will be in your project) > >>>>> - Much faster. Server start was up over 10s now is just 2s. Much > >> more > >>>>> fun to work with this tool. > >>>>> > >>>>> Eclipse support went from frustrating and tedious to fun and > >> simple. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -David > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Apr 17, 2012, at 10:02 PM, David Blevins wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Looks like the links were not quite right :) Need update the > >> template. > >>>>> Here is what it should have listed: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> SVN Tag: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-4.0.0/ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Maven Repo: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-068 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Binaries & Source: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/staging-068/openejb-4.0.0/ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Legal: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/staging-068/legal/archives.html > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -David > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >
