I've checked out the openejb source code from the repository, and had some wishes from the developers of the project. There are lots of javadocs missing in the source codes and the workspace is IMO extremly complex structured (My IDE (IDEA 10) is heavly processing to resolve dependencies right now) Do you mind if it would be better to setup a new branch for these examples? instead to commit all into the single trunk to create a new project like "openejb-examples/trunk" ? It would also help the tools and analyze the production code better. http://nemo.sonarsource.org/dashboard/index/108716?page_id=3 I don't think that the source has really %18,3 code duplications, but there must be duplications in examples and tests.
Is there any plan in sight to refactor the project? PS-1: Lack of javadocs in classes like OpenEjbContainer is critical to understand the source code i.e. how the whole thing works. PS-2: Code Coverage %27.3 ? Erhan
