So all is fine? What are we waiting for now? Le 19 nov. 2012 22:39, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> > On Nov 19, 2012, at 7:49 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Afair the policy so far has been that all packages must be under the TLP > name. That was the reason why CODI also has > org.apache.myfaces.extension.cdi and not simply org.apache.codi. That was > the main reason for proposing two TLPs even if there is lots of overlap. > > Not sure if this argument is still valid or if we could get an exception > from board though... > > It's as much of a rule as we want to make it. Some popular Apache > packages that are not TLPs: > > - org.apache.derby > - org.apache.torque > - org.apache.yoko > - org.apache.xbean > - org.apache.woden > - org.apache.neethi > > If you use a clear brand, it's not a problem. If you do > "org.apache.naming", that's awfully frowned upon. :) > > If we want to change package names on code we can do that, but there > certainly won't be anyone forcing us to do that. > > > -David > >
