some questions ... * Is it correct that [website] is Ant based? * Is it correct that [openejb1] is Maven based? * Is it correct that you want to move [website] into the [openejb1] tree?
David Blevins schrieb: > On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 10:03:23AM +0200, Jacek Laskowski wrote: > >>David Blevins wrote: >> >> >>>Yea, it was there originally. We probably should move it back and do >>>the same for the other modules. At least the main docs for the >>>release. >> >>http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/OPENEJB-43. >> >> >>>The concecpt of a website is all the docs aggregated >>>together, so we still need to figure that out. >> >>I don't get it. What do you mean? > > > I mean that we need a place to put information that isn't release > specific (mailing list, cvs locations, release download page, other > non-version specific information). I imagine we'd need to take that > from some place, tack on the release specific pages and that would be > our website. > > As to how to do that and where to put it all, I don't know. > > >>>Maybe we could have "1.0", "2.0", "3.0" sections to our website like >>>Tomcat has on their website. >> >>+1. If it increases OpenEJB understanding, it's worth to have it. >> >>http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/OPENEJB-44 > > > Hehe. Nice disclaimer in the description :) > > > >>p.s. Could you create a new component in JIRA - docs. I could only see >>website. > > > Done. > > > -David > > !DSPAM:42ca4c5f360156053071605! > > -- Mit freundlichen Gruessen / With kind regards DAn.I.El S. Haischt Spammers, please please send any mail to: Daniel S. Haischt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Want a complete signature??? Type at a shell prompt: $ > finger -l [EMAIL PROTECTED]
