On Nov 8, 2005, at 2:14 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
David Blevins wrote, On 10/31/2005 6:47 PM:
On Oct 31, 2005, at 6:17 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Oct 31, 2005, at 3:47 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
That is exactly what I was thinking of. That would be completely
fine by me.
david jencks
Let us know if there is anything we can do to help.
Well, I would really like one thing I can run to build geronimo +
openejb. If there is some way to call an m1 project from m2, I
would think we could get everything except the assembly module
converted now to m2.
Brett had a couple ideas along that line. I'll put them in a thread
on the Geronimo list as it seems like the best place to settle that
part.
So, is it safe to assume we are at the point where everyone is
onboard to switch on the OpenEJB side provided we can figure
something out on the Geronimo side to still build OpenEJB when
Geronimo builds?
Let's do it. :)
Fine with me but...
I recently added a geronimo plugin to construct geronimo-service.xml
dependency files from the maven dependencies. This is so far just a
maven 1 plugin. It requires at least one geronimo module
(service-builder) for xmlbeans classes. I'd suggest resurrecting the
hand-written geronimo-service.xml file for core until we can get this
plugin migrated to m2
thanks
david jencks
