[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12501024
]
David Jencks commented on OPENJPA-244:
--------------------------------------
Would it make any sense to, rather than having a class with static methods,
having an interface/abstract class and a static INSTANCE? Then some
initialization (static) code could decide which implementation is appropriate
for the environment: e.g. if no security manager is installed we wouldn't need
the doPrivileged code? I don't know if going through the doPrivileged code
when it isn't doing anything incurs enough expense to make this worthwhile.
> Java 2 Security enablement
> --------------------------
>
> Key: OPENJPA-244
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-244
> Project: OpenJPA
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.9.8
> Reporter: Kevin Sutter
> Attachments: J2DoPrivHelper.java
>
>
> Via some testing with the WebSphere Application Server, it's been discovered
> that we're missing some doPriv blocks through out the OpenJPA code base.
> This JIRA report will be used to resolve these issues. More specific
> examples will be posted later.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.