Agree with the group. Get setup on new machine, but the history is not necessary.
On 7/11/07, Michael Dick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 from me too. History is nice but optional - I don't think we really need it. -Mike On 7/11/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I agree with Craig: I would like it to get set up on the new machine, > and I don't care much about the history. > > > > On Jul 11, 2007, at 8:00 AM, Craig L Russell wrote: > > > So, > > > > What do you all think? I'm in favor of having it set up again, not > > so interested in the history. > > > > Craig > > > > On Jul 11, 2007, at 7:05 AM, Brett Porter wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'm not on this list, so please reply directly - thanks. > >> > >> OpenJPA currently have a build set up in vmbuild.apache.org. It's > >> been down for little bit, but is now back up. > >> > >> vmbuild is scheduled to be moved to a faster machine, and I intend > >> to install a more recent build of Continuum (that supports > >> grouping projects and is generally faster, more managable and more > >> stable). I'm able to help get it set up as effectively as possible. > >> > >> There are a lot of failing builds on the machine right now > >> (probably unused by the corresponding projects), so I'm cleaning > >> house before the move. > >> > >> Please let me know if: > >> [ ] you would like the project set up on the new machine with a > >> clean slate > >> [ ] you would like the project (and it's build history if > >> possible) moved over > >> [ ] you are no longer interested in using vmbuild for CI/nightlies/ > >> whatever > >> > >> Thanks! > >> - Brett > >> > > > > Craig Russell > > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo > > 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! > > > >
