No change:
SELECT t0.EMP_TYPE, t1.id, t0.dept_id, t0.description, t0.manager_id FROM
Employee t0 LEFT OUTER JOIN Address t1 ON t0.address_id = t1.id WHERE t0.id = ?
[params=(int) 1]
On Monday, August 13, 2007, at 03:25PM, "Patrick Linskey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Hmm. What happens if you put @Basic annotations on the fields in Address?
>
>-Patrick
>
>On 8/13/07, Joe Grassel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Looks like the only query that goes out is:
>>
>>
>> [main] openjpa.jdbc.SQL - <t 16515324, conn 1700554076> executing prepstmnt
>> 1983018546 SELECT t0.EMP_TYPE, t1.id, t0.dept_id, t0.description,
>> t0.manager_id FROM Employee t0 LEFT OUTER JOIN Address t1 ON t0.address_id =
>> t1.id WHERE t0.id = ? [params=(int) 1]
>>
>>
>> On Monday, August 13, 2007, at 02:37PM, "Patrick Linskey" <[EMAIL
>> PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Is this a bug in OpenJPA, or is a proxy object supposed to be in the
>> >> Address entity's place?
>> >
>> >I would expect the address data to be available.
>> >
>> >What SQL is produced by the find call?
>> >
>> >-Patrick
>> >
>> >On 8/13/07, Joe Grassel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Hello, I'm writing a program that is trying to capitalize on FetchGroups,
>> >> but I'm hitting some behavior that I was not expecting, based on what I
>> >> read from the manual.
>> >>
>> >> I have two entities, Employee and Address, as follows:
>> >>
>> >> @Entity
>> >> @FetchGroups({
>> >> @FetchGroup(name="DescFetchGroup", attributes= [EMAIL
>> >> PROTECTED](name="description")} ),
>> >> @FetchGroup(name="AddressFetchGroup", attributes= [EMAIL
>> >> PROTECTED](name="address")} )
>> >> //...
>> >> })
>> >> public class Employee {
>> >> @Id
>> >> private int id;
>> >>
>> >> //...
>> >>
>> >> @Basic(fetch=FetchType.LAZY)
>> >> private String description;
>> >>
>> >> @OneToOne(fetch=FetchType.LAZY)
>> >> private Address address;
>> >>
>> >> //...
>> >>
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> and
>> >>
>> >> @Entity
>> >> public class Address {
>> >> @Id
>> >> private int id;
>> >>
>> >> private String street;
>> >> private String city;
>> >> private String state;
>> >> private int zip;
>> >>
>> >> //...
>> >>
>> >> public String toString()
>> >> {
>> >> StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer();
>> >> sb.append("Address(id=").append(this.id).append(")");
>> >> sb.append(": street=").append(getStreet());
>> >> sb.append(": city=").append(getCity());
>> >> sb.append(": state=").append(getState());
>> >> sb.append(": zip=").append(getZip());
>> >>
>> >> return new String(sb);
>> >> }
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> This is what I'm trying to do:
>> >>
>> >> // ...
>> >> OpenJPAEntityManager oem = (OpenJPAEntityManager) em;
>> >> oem.getFetchPlan().addFetchGroups("DescFetchGroup");
>> >> oem.getFetchPlan().addFetchGroups("AddressFetchGroup");
>> >>
>> >> oem.clear();
>> >> Employee emp = oem.find(Employee.class, 1);
>> >> oem.clear();
>> >>
>> >> if (emp.getDescription() != null)
>> >> System.out.println("Employee description=" + emp.getDescription());
>> >> else
>> >> System.out.println("Description is null");
>> >>
>> >> if (emp.getAddress() != null)
>> >> System.out.println("Employee address=" + emp.getAddress());
>> >> else
>> >> System.out.println("Address is null");
>> >>
>> >> // ...
>> >>
>> >> I get the following results:
>> >>
>> >> Employee description=Description 1
>> >> Employee address=Address(id=1): street=null: city=null: state=null: zip=0
>> >>
>> >> It looks like an empty proxy object containing just the Address entity's
>> >> primary key is returned. I was under the impression that with the
>> >> AddressFetchGroup added to the fetch plan, that the whole (Address)
>> >> entity's persistent state would be eagerly loaded.
>> >>
>> >> Is this a bug in OpenJPA, or is a proxy object supposed to be in the
>> >> Address entity's place?
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >Patrick Linskey
>> >202 669 5907
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>--
>Patrick Linskey
>202 669 5907
>
>
