Patrick, If I was forced to pick one, I would go with FooType, but I am flexible either way.
Kevin On 8/20/07, Patrick Linskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I think that I'm mostly done with the API changes -- see OPENJPA-317. > > One outstanding issue is a naming problem. Internally, we use a > 'FooMode' naming structure for lots of our symbolic constants, but the > JPA spec uses a 'FooType' naming structure for its enums. Which should > we obey? The most recent patch mostly goes the 'FooType' route. > > -Patrick > > -- > Patrick Linskey > 202 669 5907 >
