The fix is already in openjpa trunk, it just needs to move over to the 1.0.0branch. We might as well fix it. We were just wondering what the process was -- whether Marc was going to start over with another cut from trunk or just re-spin from the branch. We'll move this change over quickly... Thanks.
Kevin On 8/22/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I think that it's fair game for hardening / bugfix changes, but I > don't think that we should hold up the release for everything. > > Note that a new candidate build will be kicking off in the next 30 > mins or so (if it hasn't already). > > Do you think that this issue is worth holding things up for, or is > this more of a serendipitious situation? > > -Patrick > > On 8/22/07, Michael Dick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is the branch considered "open" and fair game for other new changes? I'm > > just curious whether I can / should port OPENJPA-326 to 1.0.0. > > > > -Mike > > > > On 8/22/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > OpenJPA Developers- > > > > > > I am rescinding this vote for the second time, due to the recent > > > problems we discovered with the new enhancer property. > > > > > > I expect that within the next few hours we'll have a new artifact > > > uploaded and either I or Patrick will start a new vote. > > > > > > Sorry for all the false starts, but we want to be sure we get it > > > right. Thanks for your patience. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 21, 2007, at 11:59 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote: > > > > > > > OpenJPA Developers- > > > > > > > > A second attempt is now being made to cut the 1.0.0 release after > > > > the discussion at http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Approve- > > > > OpenJPA-1.0.0-release-tf4306366.html . > > > > > > > > A candidate build for OpenJPA 1.0.0 is available at: > > > > > > > > http://openjpa.apache.org/builds/1.0.0/downloads/ > > > > > > > > Please review these artifacts and signatures, and vote whether we > > > > should release them as Apache OpenJPA version 1.0.0. Release notes > > > > for this release are included in the artifact, or can be browsed at: > > > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openjpa/branches/1.0.0/openjpa- > > > > project/RELEASE-NOTES.html > > > > > > > > The Apache Release Audit Tool has been run on the release, and no > > > > missing licenses were found with the exceptions listed in the > > > > exclusion section of the "rat-maven-plugin" configuration in http:// > > > > svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openjpa/branches/1.0.0/pom.xml . > > > > > > > > In accordance with http://www.apache.org/foundation/ > > > > voting.html#ReleaseVotes , three +1 votes will be sufficient to > > > > approve the release for publication. While it is not possible to > > > > veto a release, the vote will remain open for the standard 3 day > > > > period (ending at 23:59 EST on Friday 8/24) in order to allow > > > > people to thoroughly review the release and perform whatever > > > > additional testing they desire and raise any concerns or objections. > > > > > > > > A vote of "+1" means you approve of the release for publication, > > > > "-1" means you do not approve, and a "+0" or "-0" means you are > > > > neutral. > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance for your diligence in helping to ensure that the > > > > quality of the OpenJPA 1.0.0 release reflects the high quality of > > > > all of its contributors! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Patrick Linskey > 202 669 5907 >
