At Kevin's request, I'm rescinding this vote. -Patrick
On 8/22/07, Patrick Linskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OpenJPA Developers- > > A third attempt is now being made to cut the 1.0.0 release after the > discussion at http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Approve-OpenJPA-1.0.0- > release-tf4306366.html . > > A candidate build for OpenJPA 1.0.0 is available at: > > http://openjpa.apache.org/builds/1.0.0/downloads/ > > Please review these artifacts and signatures, and vote whether we > should release them as Apache OpenJPA version 1.0.0. Release notes > for this release are included in the artifact, or can be browsed at: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openjpa/branches/1.0.0/openjpa- > project/RELEASE-NOTES.html > > The Apache Release Audit Tool has been run on the release, and no > missing licenses were found with the exceptions listed in the > exclusion section of the "rat-maven-plugin" configuration in http:// > svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openjpa/branches/1.0.0/pom.xml . > > In accordance with http://www.apache.org/foundation/ > voting.html#ReleaseVotes , three +1 votes will be sufficient to > approve the release for publication. While it is not possible to veto > a release, the vote will remain open for the standard 3 day period > (ending at 23:59 EST on Friday 8/24) in order to allow people to > thoroughly review the release and perform whatever additional testing > they desire and raise any concerns or objections. > > A vote of "+1" means you approve of the release for publication, "-1" > means you do not approve, and a "+0" or "-0" means you are neutral. > > Thanks in advance for your diligence in helping to ensure that the > quality of the OpenJPA 1.0.0 release reflects the high quality of all > of its contributors! > > Note that this email does not constitute a vote in any direction from > me; I'm still running some tests. > > -Patrick > > -- > Patrick Linskey > 202 669 5907 > -- Patrick Linskey 202 669 5907
