Hi Patrick, It seemed like a lot of "fixes" were going into the 1.1.0 release and not making it back into the 1.0.x release. Since it seemed like it might be a while before we develop enough new feature content to warrant a bump from 1.0.0 to 1.1.0, I think it would be worthwhile to keep 1.0.x up-to-date as far as fixes are concerned. I had done a quick JIRA query and found that we had close to a dozen fixes in the 1.1.0 release that had not made it back to the 1.0.x release. Reading through the JIRA reports, the problems sounded like plain old defects and not new features. I started to move some of the changes back to the 1.0.x release and then Mike started to help out.
So, from a release maintenance viewpoint, I would like us to be more diligent with ensuring that defect fixes make it back into the current maintenance release (as well as trunk). Of course, there may be reasons why this may not make sense due to the extent of the changes, but so far the changes have been pretty minimal. The most extensive change is with the Java 2 security changes at this point. If I am misinterpreting the x.y.z release conventions, then let's discuss that. Thanks, Kevin On 9/18/07, Patrick Linskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > It seems like we've had a lot of activity merging things to the 1.0.x > branch. Personally, it seems like there's maybe even too much stuff > going into there; what is our plan for QA for the changes in the 1.0.1 > release at this point? > > Also, a lot of the @since tags are now wrong, since they were written > with 1.1.0 in mind, but now the changes are slated for 1.0.1. > > Thoughts? > > -Patrick > > -- > Patrick Linskey > 202 669 5907 >
