Re: Proposal for releasing 1.0.1

[Craig L Russell]

Hi Albert,

On Oct 24, 2007, at 9:52 AM, Albert Lee wrote:

Thanks for all the positive responses.


I'll start the necessary work for this release.

(Do we need a official vote on this decision?)

Let's plan on freezing the content of the 1.0.1 release on 10/29 Monday and

Craig

We need to vote on the release itself but your informal request for feedback is sufficient to notify everyone. Normally, in Apache projects, the minimum comment period on a proposal is three days. Since you sent the request for comments on Monday, Thursday would be the comment period close day. If no one has anything negative to say before close of comments, we will have consensus. But you can continue to plan your work...

Otherwise I'll proceed as plan on 10/29.

Thanks again.
Albert Lee.

On 10/23/07, Patrick Linskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Please post here if you have any concerns on the timing of this proposal.

Hi,

Theoretically, this process should be a bunch easier now that we have
an automated build machine running builds and uploading release
candidates on the 1.0.x line.

Currently, the 1.0.x build is passing the CTS and all our tests
against Derby. A new release candidate build is automatically
triggered every time a change is made in the 1.0.x line.

-Patrick

On 10/22/07, Albert Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

We have a need to freeze and build the current content of the 1.0.1release.

work.

With Mike Dick's help and guidance, I am volunteering to do this release I am wondering if the community has any objection to this proposal. We

are

looking to make this happen in the next couple/few weeks time frame.

Thanks
Albert Lee.

--
Patrick Linskey
202 669 5907

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature