When do we update the documentation site? ( http://cwiki.apache.org/openjpa/documentation.html) Is that a post release [vote] activity?
On 11/5/07, Albert Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I had another team member, who has access to the TCK license, ran the TCK > before OPENJPA-370 is removed. I plan to do the same for this release > candidate. > > If you can also give it a try, that would also be great. It does not hurt > to > have another source to validate the image is good. > > Thanks, > Albert Lee. > > On 11/5/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Albert- > > > > Looks good to me. Were you able to run it against the TCK? If you > > don't have access, I can run it here and make sure it passes. > > > > > > > > On Nov 5, 2007, at 1:22 PM, Albert Lee wrote: > > > > > A candidate build for OpenJPA 1.0.1 maintenance release is available > > > at: > > > > > > http://openjpa.apache.org/builds/1.0.1/downloads/ > > > > > > Please review these artifacts and signatures, and vote whether we > > > should > > > release them as Apache OpenJPA version 1.0.1. > > > > > > Release notes for this release are included in the artifact, or can be > > > browsed at: > > > > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openjpa/branches/1.0.1/openjpa-project/RELEASE-NOTES.html > > > > > > > > > The Apache Release Audit Tool has been run on the release, and no > > > missing > > > licenses were found with the exceptions listed in the exclusion > > > section of > > > the "rat-maven-plugin" configuration in > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openjpa/branches/1.0.1/pom.xml . > > > > > > In accordance with > > http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes > > > , three +1 votes will be sufficient to approve the release for > > > publication. > > > While it is not possible to veto a release, the vote will remain > > > open for > > > the standard 3 day period (ending at 18:00 CST on Thursday 11/8) in > > > order to > > > allow people to thoroughly review the release and perform whatever > > > additional testing they desire and raise any concerns or objections. > > > > > > A vote of "+1" means you approve of the release for publication, > > > "-1" means > > > you do not approve, and a "+0" or "-0" means you are neutral. > > > > > > Thanks in advance for your diligence in helping to ensure that the > > > quality > > > of the OpenJPA 1.0.1 release reflects the high quality of all of its > > > contributors! > > > > > > Albert Lee. > > > > >
