> * Major release - Should the major release parallels to the JPA spec > numbering?
I don't think so. For JPA2, it's convenient to do so. But I don't think that that will always be the case. > - application, with no source change, re-compiles in (n+1)th release can > execute in (n)th release. Just to clarify, you mean "application that executed in (n)th release can re-compile in (n+1)th release", right? -Patrick On Feb 2, 2008 8:22 PM, Albert Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Major release - Should the major release parallels to the JPA spec > numbering? > > * Backward compatibility - I just want clarifications on the following > scenario: > - application compiled in (n)th release can execute in (n+1)th release > without re-compilation. > - application, with no source change, re-compiles in (n+1)th release can > execute in (n)th release. > - application, with source change that use new functions, re-compiles in > (n+1)th release can only be executed in (n+1)th release. > > Thanks, > Albert Lee. > > > On Feb 2, 2008 5:40 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to formalize our release policy. Please take a look at > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=55076 > > and comment. > > > > I'd like to remove the *DRAFT* status of the policy next week. > > > > Craig > > > > Craig Russell > > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo > > 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! > > > > > > > -- > Albert Lee. > -- Patrick Linskey 202 669 5907
