Sorry for the late response (hadn't been watching the alias). The intent of the branch (original email) was to see if we could only have minimal set of vital changes in the branch that could be used for Weblogic maintenance-packs.
- Srinivasa -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 12:08 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: svn commit: r670740 - in /openjpa/branches/wls-maintenance: ./ 1000mp1/ I agree with Kevin that we should eschew vendor tags in the OpenJPA repository. It should be sufficient to have maintenance folks know from which branch a maintenance release was cut (r547073, openjpa/trunk/ is really where you shipped from??? After creating a 1.1.0 tag?). And we now have trunk, 1.1.x, and 1.0.x branches as active code lines. The only reason that I can think of to have a vendor tag is so you can do vendor maintenance in it. And I don't think we want to do that. If you need to make patches for specific customers, it seems that a local repository would be appropriate. And once the patch is verified to work, put the update into an Apache svn branch. What do others think? Craig On Jun 23, 2008, at 2:36 PM, Kevin Sutter wrote: > Wait a minute, Srinivasa. This doesn't seem right. I will admit > that I > didn't see your original posting asking for guidance, but I really > don't > think we want WebLogic, WebSphere, Geronimo, or any other vendor's > specific > maintenance releases housed in the OpenJPA SVN repository. > > It looks like WebLogic shipped something between the 0.9.7- > incubating and > the official 1.0.0 release. Is there some reason why you couldn't > just > support your WebLogic customers using the 1.0.x service stream? It > would > seem that customers would appreciate using an official release (post > incubation) instead of the the one WebLogic initially shipped. > > Do you need a complete branch? Or, are you just interested in > tagging the > branch so that you can easily find the start of your service stream? > > I think we need to do something different here. I don't like the > approach > that you used. > > Kevin > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 3:36 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Author: ssegu >> Date: Mon Jun 23 13:36:41 2008 >> New Revision: 670740 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=670740&view=rev >> Log: >> Branched from revision that BEA WebLogic Server 10.0 MP1 was released >> from(rev #547073). >> >> http://www.nabble.com/OpenJPA-branches-td16547180.html#a16547180 >> >> Added: >> openjpa/branches/wls-maintenance/ >> openjpa/branches/wls-maintenance/1000mp1/ >> - copied from r547073, openjpa/trunk/ >> >> Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.
