Oops. Let me rescind my comment here. My comments are more generally
to the effect that if there is a defect that applies to a released
version, that version (or versions) should be identified.
This JIRA doesn't describe a defect, so it might not even need an
"affects" version.
What do others think?
Craig
On Jan 30, 2009, at 9:46 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
For "affects" versions, this should be released versions. So in this
case, "affects" would be 1.2.0 (released) and "fixed" is properly
identified as 1.3.0 (not released). And the trunk patch would be
identified as fixed in 2.0.0.
Craig
On Jan 30, 2009, at 10:18 AM, Donald Woods (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated OPENJPA-882:
---------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 1.3.0
Affects Version/s: 1.3.0
Upgrade to latest Geronimo Spec releases
----------------------------------------
Key: OPENJPA-882
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-882
Project: OpenJPA
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: build / infrastructure
Affects Versions: 1.3.0, 2.0.0
Reporter: Donald Woods
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 1.3.0, 2.0.0
Attachments: OPENJPA-882-branches13x.patch, OPENJPA-882-
trunk.patch
Pickup the latest Geronimo Spec releases.
Upgrade geronimo-jms_1.1_spec from 1.0.1 to 1.1.1
Upgrade geronimo-jta_1.1_spec from 1.1 to 1.1.1
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[email protected]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[email protected]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
