Rick, If you enable DBCP and run the quoted benchmark using JPA, what improvement do you see with the insert throughput?
> -----Original Message----- > From: Rick Curtis [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, 5 February 2009 9:21 a.m. > To: [email protected] > Subject: Improving out of the box performance > > > After reading this > http://terrazadearavaca.blogspot.com/2008/12/jpa-implementations- > comparison.html > blog post , I decided to do some performance(ish) testing on my local > system > and I also came the conclusion that openJPA isn't the fastest out of the > box(I don't think that's a surprise to anyone). It was easy to get > something > working, but it didn't work as fast as it could/should have. Ease of use > is > a high priority when a developer is trying out a new technology, but not > the > only priority. > > A steaming pile that is easy to use, is still a steaming pile. :-) > > In an attempt to make openJPA perform better out of the box, I'd like to > see > DBCP packaged with openJPA and have the docs updated to stress the use > DBCP > rather than a direct DB connection. This won't add much in the way of > complexity, but it will help the performance greatly. I wrote a blog post > about this very topic that can be found > http://webspherepersistence.blogspot.com/2009/01/jpa-connection- > pooling.html > here . > > Any thoughts? > -- > View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Improving-out-of-the- > box-performance-tp2271261p2271261.html > Sent from the OpenJPA Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
