[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-925?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12674651#action_12674651
 ] 

Donald Woods commented on OPENJPA-925:
--------------------------------------

Catalina, this looks like like it resolved my testcase for OPENJPA-919, so can 
we get this back ported to the 1.2.x branch?
I'll create a patch and attach it, as I need to apply this to my local 1.2.x 
code and rerun the failing EJB TCK testcases for Geronimo to verify that this 
did fix our problems.


> Bidirectional OneToOne relation incorrectly set in loadEagerJoin
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OPENJPA-925
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-925
>             Project: OpenJPA
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.0, 1.2.1, 1.3.0, 2.0.0-M1, 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Catalina Wei
>            Assignee: Catalina Wei
>
> A test scenario uncovers a bug in eager loading bidirectional OneToOne 
> relation.
>   OneOneParent  has a bidirectional OneToOne relation with OneOneChild as 
> annotated as following:
> @Entity
> public class OneOneParent {
> ...
>     @OneToOne(mappedBy="parent")
>     private OneOneChild child;
> }
> @Entity
> public class OneOneChild {
> ...
>     @OneToOne
>     private OneOneParent parent;
> }
> Testcase:
> String query = "select c FROM OneOneChild c";
>         Query q = em.createQuery(query);
>         List list = q.getResultList();
>         for (int i = 0; i < list.size(); i++) {
>             OneOneChild c = (OneOneChild) list.get(i);
>             assertEquals(c, c.getParent().getChild());
>         }
> We expect c equals c.getParent().getChild(), but instead got assertion 
> failure.
> It seems to be a bug introduced in performance improvement work (the related 
> issues: OPENJPA-292 & OPENJPA-744).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to