As (one of) the leading advocate(s) of this change I'm perhaps easily swayed by Pinaki's argument regarding the compatibility option.
That said I understand that many people have strong feelings on this issue and additional discussion may be needed. Craig, do you have a specific concern with Pinaki's changes, or can we leave the JIRA open an discuss there? -mike On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Pinaki Poddar <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Craig, > I understand your concerns because I had similar ones. That is why this > change does retain the past behavior exactly as it was. The user only > requires the following configuration to get exactly the same behavior > openjpa.Compatibility=FlushBeforeDetach=true,CopyOnDetach=true > > In fact, JDO having a separate signature as detachCopy() is a good news > because then we can add the same signature to Broker so that the user will > not even need the above configuration for backward compatible behavior. > > Regards -- > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://n2.nabble.com/Re%3A-svn-commit%3A-r751910---in--openjpa-trunk%3A-openjpa-kernel-src-main-java-org-apache-openjpa-conf--openjpa-kernel-src-main-java-org-apache-openjpa-kernel--openjpa-kernel-src-main-java-org-apache-tp2458104p2458226.html > Sent from the OpenJPA Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
