[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rick Curtis updated OPENJPA-1400:
---------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 1.3.0
1.2.2
> Unable to persist a relationship to a detached Entity
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OPENJPA-1400
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1400
> Project: OpenJPA
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: kernel
> Affects Versions: 1.2.1, 2.0.0-M3
> Reporter: Rick Curtis
> Assignee: Rick Curtis
> Fix For: 1.2.2, 1.3.0, 2.0.0-M4
>
> Attachments: decompiled_entities.zip, OPENJPA-1400-1.2.x.patch,
> OPENJPA-1400.patch
>
>
> I ran into a problem where OpenJPA is unable to persist a relationship from
> an attached Entity to a detached Entity. The problem occurs if the detached
> Entity does not have a DetachedState
> {openjpa.DetachState=loaded(DetachedStateField=false)} and the version is
> zero. When trying to flush the scenario described, the following exception is
> thrown by OpenJPA:
> <openjpa-2.0.0-SNAPSHOT-r422266:882172M nonfatal user error>
> org.apache.openjpa.persistence.InvalidStateException: Encountered unmanaged
> object in persistent field
> "org.apache.openjpa.persistence.detachment.model.NoDetachedStateEntityFieldAccess.relationship"
> during flush. However, this field does not allow cascade persist. Set the
> cascade attribute for this field to CascadeType.PERSIST or CascadeType.ALL
> (JPA annotations) or "persist" or "all" (JPA orm.xml), or enable
> cascade-persist globally, or manually persist the related field value prior
> to flushing. You cannot flush unmanaged objects or graphs that have
> persistent associations to unmanaged objects.
> This scenario should work, but OpenJPA incorrectly determines that the
> detached Entity was never actually a part of a persistence context. If
> version field is anything other than zero the flush of the relationship works
> as expected. This problem is in the enhanced bytecode we assume that when no
> StateManager is present a version of zero means that an Entity isn't
> detached.
> // Decompiled Entity bytecode
> public Boolean pcIsDetached()
> {
> if(pcStateManager != null)
> if(pcStateManager.isDetached())
> return Boolean.TRUE;
> else
> return Boolean.FALSE;
> if(pcGetDetachedState() != null && pcGetDetachedState() !=
> PersistenceCapable.DESERIALIZED)
> return Boolean.TRUE;
> if(_version != 0)
> return Boolean.TRUE;
> else
> return Boolean.FALSE;
> }
> I will attach a patch which recreates this problem and also provides a
> solution. My solution to this problem is to add a boolean to the enhanced
> bytecode to keep track of whether or not the version field has been set. This
> fixes the problem for most cases, but there are still holes. In addition to
> the patch, I'll also post two decompiled Entities. One of those is enhanced
> with the existing code and the other is with my proposed changes.
> Notes:
> - For the sake of time, I did not fix this problem when using unenhanced
> classes.
> - This problem still exists if the detached Entity has been serialized at any
> point.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
