Hi Albert,
Yes, I have been making commits for Amy Yang and Ravi Palacherla in the
past few days. Patches for OpenJPA-386, 681, 817, 1200, and 1260 were
made to the 1.1.x branch. It is my understanding from the JIRA issues
that the same patches were made to trunk some time ago. In several
cases, these issues were marked as closed or resolved.
For OpenJPA-1258, I have not yet applied the patch to trunk. Amy and I
are discussing the suitability of the patch for trunk, and I will either
apply the patch to trunk or one of us will update the JIRA issue with
our thinking.
Hope this clarifies the situation.
Thanks,
David
Albert Lee wrote:
I saw quite a few of revisions committed into 1.1.x branch but was not in
other forward releases, i.e. 1.3.0 and trunk. It is a general practice to
commit the same changes to the current release to avoid breakage and
regression when users move up to the current release. Please consider
migrating these relevant commits to (at least) trunk.
Thanks,
Albert Lee.
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 12:01 PM, David Ezzio (JIRA) <[email protected]>wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790264#action_12790264]
David Ezzio commented on OPENJPA-1258:
--------------------------------------
Applied Amy's patch to 1.1.x branch at 890415.
make warning message more friendly when other persistence provider
configured by application
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: OPENJPA-1258
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1258
Project: OpenJPA
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: logging
Affects Versions: 1.1.0
Environment: Windows XP
java version "1.5.0_14"
Reporter: Amy Yang
Priority: Minor
Attachments: OPENJPA1258.patch, OPENJPA1258_trunk.patch
When application configures other persistence provider rather than
openjpa, there will be a warning message printed out:
WARNING: Found unrecognized persistence provider
"org.eclipse.persistence.jpa.PersistenceProvider" in place of OpenJPA
provider. This provider's properties will not be used.
It is legal that other persistence provider be configured. The message
doesn't look friendly and might be confusing.
I change the message like:
INFO: Found persistence provider
"org.eclipse.persistence.jpa.PersistenceProvider". OpenJPA will not be used.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.