[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12792661#action_12792661
 ] 

Xiaoqin Feng commented on OPENJPA-1437:
---------------------------------------

I am on vacation from 12/20/2009  to 12/26/2009.

If you have any question on deployment and JEE bugs, please contact Saurabh 
Arora or my manager Maruthi Nuthikattu.

For emergency, contact me at 925-209-5517.


> Implement a vendor extension mechanism for persistence.xml and orm.xml
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OPENJPA-1437
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1437
>             Project: OpenJPA
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.1
>            Reporter: David M. Karr
>
> OpenJPA 1.2.1 implements version 1.0 of the JPA specification.  OpenJPA has 
> some extensions that provide additional functionality, some of it identical 
> to what is implemented in JPA version 2.0. For instance, the "@OrderColumn" 
> annotation.  This is something I need in my application, because the database 
> I'm mapping to uses a join table for an ordered list, where the join table 
> has a "SEQUENCE_NUM" column to specify the ordering.
> I've implemented my application only using "logical" JPA annotations, where 
> the physical descriptions are in the orm.xml. Unfortunately, as there is no 
> vendor extension mechanism for the orm.xml, I can't specify "order-column" in 
> the orm.xml, so I have to specify it in the annotation. In addition, as the 
> orm.xml attribute definition completely overrides any annotations for the 
> same attribute, this means that for any attributes that I need to specify 
> this ordering for, I have to put all the physical description (table, column, 
> etc.) into the annotations for that field.
> This particular instance of this problem will go away when I eventually move 
> to the JPA 2.0 implementation, but in the future the possibility still exists 
> that I or someone else might find a custom OpenJPA mapping feature to be 
> useful or necessary, and be forced to specify the entire attribute details in 
> the annotation, instead of the ideal (in my opinion) arrangement with the 
> logical annotation and physical xml.
> So, my suggestion is to somehow implement what the JPA specification didn't 
> think of (that I can see), which is the ability to deploy a parallel 
> OpenJPA-specific persistence.xml and orm.xml, where I can put the custom 
> "order-column" element, to avoid having to do this in annotations.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to