[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated OPENJPA-1609:
----------------------------------
Affects Version/s: (was: 2.0.0-beta3)
(was: 2.0.0-beta2)
(was: 2.0.0-beta)
(was: 2.0.0-M3)
(was: 2.0.0-M1)
(was: 2.0.0-M2)
2.0.0
Fix Version/s: 2.1.0
2.0.0
> PessimisticLockException instead of LockTimeoutException thrown on DB2V9 for
> ZOS
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OPENJPA-1609
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1609
> Project: OpenJPA
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Environment: DB2V91 on z/OS
> Reporter: Jody Grassel
> Assignee: Jody Grassel
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 2.1.0
>
>
> I am observing the following problem while working with OpenJPA 2.x on DB2v91
> for z/OS:
> When performing a EntityManager.find() with a lock timeout property set, I'm
> expecting to receive a LockTimeoutException if my find operation fails to
> fetch the data from the database within the specified timeout period.
> Instead of getting the LockTimeoutException, I am getting a
> PessimisticLockException -- an Exception that is considerably more severe
> then is expected.
> I looked at the stack trace, and found the following information:
> **Exception: Caught unexpected exception from find.
> org.apache.openjpa.persistence.PessimisticLockException:Unable to obtain
> an object lock on "null [java.lang.String]".
> FailedObject: 1 [org.apache.openjpa.util.IntId] [java.lang.String]
> at
> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.sql.DBDictionary.narrow(DBDictionary.java:4809)
> at
> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.sql.DBDictionary.newStoreException(DBDictionary.java:4787)
> at
> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.sql.DB2Dictionary.newStoreException(DB2Dictionary.java:563)
> at
> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.sql.SQLExceptions.getStore(SQLExceptions.java:136)
> at
> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.sql.SQLExceptions.getStore(SQLExceptions.java:86)
> at
> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.kernel.JDBCStoreManager.initialize(JDBCStoreManager.java:339)
> at
> com.ibm.ws.persistence.jdbc.kernel.WsJpaJDBCStoreManager.initialize(WsJpaJDBCStoreManager.java:147)
> at
> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.DelegatingStoreManager.initialize(DelegatingStoreManager.java:111)
> at
> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.ROPStoreManager.initialize(ROPStoreManager.java:57)
> at org.apache.openjpa.kernel.BrokerImpl.initialize(BrokerImpl.java:1005)
> at org.apache.openjpa.kernel.BrokerImpl.find(BrokerImpl.java:963)
> at org.apache.openjpa.kernel.BrokerImpl.find(BrokerImpl.java:880)
> at
> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.DelegatingBroker.find(DelegatingBroker.java:222)
> at
> org.apache.openjpa.persistence.EntityManagerImpl.find(EntityManagerImpl.java:496)
> at
> suite.r80.base.jpaspec.entitymanager.testlogic.FindLockTestLogic.testScenarioL009(FindLockTestLogic.java:2150)
> ...
> Caused by: org.apache.openjpa.lib.jdbc.ReportingSQLException: DB2 SQL Error:
> SQLCODE=-913, SQLSTATE=57033,
> SQLERRMC=00C9008E;00000304;DSN00292.JPA20EME.X'00000002'.X'01',
> DRIVER=3.57.91 {prepstmnt 2135785293 SELECT t0.version, t1.id, t1.version,
> t1.ENTITYALAZY_ID, t1.strData, t0.strData FROM JPA20EMEntityA t0 LEFT OUTER
> JOIN JPA20EMEntityC t1 ON t0.id = t1.ENTITYA_ID WHERE t0.id = ? optimize for
> 1 row FOR READ ONLY WITH RR USE AND KEEP UPDATE LOCKS [params=(int) 1]}
> [code=-913, state=57033]
> at
> org.apache.openjpa.lib.jdbc.LoggingConnectionDecorator.wrap(LoggingConnectionDecorator.java:257)
> at
> org.apache.openjpa.lib.jdbc.LoggingConnectionDecorator.wrap(LoggingConnectionDecorator.java:241)
> at
> org.apache.openjpa.lib.jdbc.LoggingConnectionDecorator.access$700(LoggingConnectionDecorator.java:70)
> at
> org.apache.openjpa.lib.jdbc.LoggingConnectionDecorator$LoggingConnection$LoggingPreparedStatement.executeQuery(LoggingConnectionDecorator.java:1063)
> at
> org.apache.openjpa.lib.jdbc.DelegatingPreparedStatement.executeQuery(DelegatingPreparedStatement.java:278)
> at
> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.kernel.JDBCStoreManager$CancelPreparedStatement.executeQuery(JDBCStoreManager.java:1706)
> at
> org.apache.openjpa.lib.jdbc.DelegatingPreparedStatement.executeQuery(DelegatingPreparedStatement.java:268)
> at
> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.sql.SelectImpl.executeQuery(SelectImpl.java:471)
> at org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.sql.SelectImpl.execute(SelectImpl.java:396)
> at
> com.ibm.ws.persistence.jdbc.sql.SelectImpl.execute(SelectImpl.java:77)
> at org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.sql.SelectImpl.execute(SelectImpl.java:354)
> at
> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.kernel.JDBCStoreManager.getInitializeStateResult(JDBCStoreManager.java:577)
> at
> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.kernel.JDBCStoreManager.initializeState(JDBCStoreManager.java:379)
> at
> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.kernel.JDBCStoreManager.initialize(JDBCStoreManager.java:334)
> ... 43 more
> The problem is that OpenJPA does not properly process the combination of
> SQLCODE=-913, SQLSTATE=57033, and SQLERRMC=00C9008E.
> The RedBook "DB2 for z/OS Stored Procedures: Through the CALL and Beyond"
> page 188 states:
> -913
> UNSUCCESSFUL EXECUTION CAUSED BY DEADLOCK OR TIMEOUT. REASON CODE
> reason-code, TYPE
> OF RESOURCE resource-type, AND RESOURCE NAME resource-name
> Explanation: The application was the victim in a deadlock or experienced a
> time-out. The
> reason code indicates whether a deadlock or time-out occurred.
> SQLERRD(3) also contains the reason-code which indicates whether a deadlock
> or time-out
> occurred. The most common reason codes are:
> 00C90088 - deadlock
> 00C9008E - time-out
> Response: The application should either commit or roll back to the previous
> COMMIT. Then,
> generally, the application should terminate. See message DSNT376I in DB2 UDB
> for z/OS
> Version 8 Messages and Codes, GC18-7422, for possible ways to avoid future
> deadlocks or
> time-outs.
> The error being reported by DB2V9 on zOS is "SQLCODE=-913, SQLSTATE=57033,
> SQLERRMC=00C9008E", which indicates that
> the reason for the unsuccessful execution is a Timeout, not a Deadlock.
> Presently, the DB2Dictionary.isFatalException() method does not support that
> combination.
> I've made a change to the isFatalException() method that considers that error
> combination, and the expected LockTimeoutException now surfaces. I will post
> the patch on to this JIRA in a few minutes.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
