[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jeremy Bauer updated OPENJPA-1689:
----------------------------------
Attachment: OPENJPA-1689_test.patch
Attaching junit that demonstrates this issue.
> The mapping tool does not remove user created sequences on PostgreSQL
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OPENJPA-1689
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1689
> Project: OpenJPA
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: jdbc
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Environment: PostgreSQL 8.4
> Reporter: Jeremy Bauer
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OPENJPA-1689_test.patch
>
>
> As reported on the users forum:
> <Christopher Schmidt>
> Hi all, using OpenJPA 2.0.0 with Postgresql 8.4 JDBC4
> I want to create the schema with the following property:
> <property name="openjpa.jdbc.SynchronizeMappings"
> value="buildSchema(SchemaAction='drop,add')"/>
> The entity is defined as follows:
> @Entity
> @Table(name = "obj_item")
> @Inheritance(strategy = InheritanceType.JOINED)
> @SequenceGenerator(name = "obj_item_id_seq", sequenceName =
> "obj_item_id_seq", allocationSize = 1)
> class ObjectItem ...
> it seems that the sequence will not be dropped - so I get the
> following exception:
> org.apache.openjpa.persistence.PersistenceException: ERROR: relation
> "obj_item_id_seq" already exists {stmnt 1834517285 CREATE SEQUENCE
> obj_item_id_seq START WITH 1} [code=0, state=42P07]
> at
> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.meta.MappingTool.record(MappingTool.java:556)...
> </Christopher Schmidt>
> <Jeremy Bauer>
> As it turns out, I don't think this problem is the same as OPENJPA-1259.
> There is special code in the PostgresDictionary that treats sequences
> suffixed with "_SEQ" as system managed sequences. The comment in
> PostgresDictionary.isSystemSequence reads:
> // filter out generated sequences used for bigserial cols, which are
> // of the form <table>_<col>_seq
> This explains why the same code worked for me on DB2. Are you able to modify
> the sequence name? (ex. sequenceName = "seq_obj_item_id") If not, please
> file a new JIRA. It may/should be possible to make the code a bit smarter
> by actually verifying _seq suffixed sequences are for a bigserial column[1]
> instead of just making the assumption.
> [1]
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/datatype-numeric.html#DATATYPE-SERIAL
> </Jeremy Bauer>
> I have a simple testcase that demonstrates the problem and only spent a very
> brief amount of time looking into a fix. Ideally, OpenJPA should be able to
> identify user created vs. system created sequences with suffix "_seq" and
> behave appropriately.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
