> As of writing this email I'm leaning toward putting this plugin in openjpa-kernel, > but I could be persuaded. Thoughts?
A tool repo is available and that is my preference. My reasons are a) tools development is expected to have higher velocity than kernel at this point. b) a separate repo will enforce better design isolation. The tools, by design, should act more as a client to the kernel. You generally will not like clients to be too near to the server -- do you? c) tools are expected to have dependency to wider libraries (JConsole, Swing, IDE libs...) -- having them in kernel will increase core runtime footprint ----- Pinaki -- View this message in context: http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/Compiling-a-JConsole-plugin-tp5627913p5631489.html Sent from the OpenJPA Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
