I somehow missing this email when you sent it originally..... and we must be smoking the same mushrooms because this the exact path that I went down.
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 1:18 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > hi folks, > i am just following the discussion about the positional parameters. > isnt it possible to think about positional parameters just as > 'named-by-numbers' parameters? > when its possible to use q.setParameter( "x", something ) and > q.setParameter( "y", anotherthing ) > then i ( without smoking too many mushrooms ) can imagine that the 2 in > q.setParameter( 2, whatever ) > is very similar to "2". So, the parameter index is not like an > array-index, but like a key in a map. > when you can handle named parameters, non-sequential index parameters > shouldnt be too difficult .. > - technically - what the standard says might another thing. > > > hth > dvh > > -- *Rick Curtis*
