Mike D. did a good job documenting the release process in: http://openjpa.apache.org/apache-nexus-release-process-12x-21x.html
Rick C. also recently used this doc to create a release. It would be good to have another third party to validate/enhance this procedure to make future release easier, more reliable and efficient to perform. Not too many of us are "expert" in this area but I believe many are willing to help if problems surface. Albert Lee. On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > can do, no problems on the maven part, but there might be 'orga' topics > waiting to be done before the release. Like updating release notes, docs, > site, etc. > I fear I'm not familiar with those yet. > > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > >________________________________ > > From: Albert Lee <[email protected]> > >To: [email protected]; Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > >Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2012 6:34 PM > >Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] release openjpa-2.2.0? > > > > > >Mark, > > > >I agree. Trunk has matured and stabilized since 2.1.x. It would be good > to take a branch and make trunk ready for the next OpenJPA "opportunity". > > > >I would like to see a more official 2.2.x as a service branch, which > OpenEJB, Geronimo and WebSphere as well can use. > > > >Are you volunteering to release 2.2.x? > > > >Albert Lee. > > > > > >On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >Hi folks! > >> > >>I've now used openjpa-2.2.0 excessively and it looks very good to me. > >>What do you think about going forward and shipping a 2.2.0? > >>Or at least a RC1... > >> > >>OpenEJB and Geronimo are waiting for an openjpa-2.2.x release as well ;) > >> > >>LieGrue, > >>strub > >> > >> > > > > > >-- > >Albert Lee. > > > > > > > -- Albert Lee.
