Okay, sounds fair. It was a nit anyway and it looks like it's been around for awhile... I'll approve the release with the expectation that this JIRA will be resolved in the near future. Thanks.
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Albert Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > Good catch. This problem is surfaced since 2.1.0. > > I have opened OPENJPA-2371< > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2371>to > get this fix after the 2.2.2 is released. > > Albert Lee. > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Kevin Sutter <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Albert, > > Why are the org.apache.openjpa.example.* packages part of our official > > javadoc package? None of our other samples are included. They probably > > don't hurt anything, but it's a little confusing. > > > > Kevin > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Albert Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Discussion thread for vote on 2.2.2 release candidate, with SVN > > source > > > tag > > > (r1468617). > > > > > > For more information on the release process, checkout - > > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html > > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html > > > > > > Some of the things to check before voting are: > > > - does "mvn apache-rat:check" pass on the source > > > - can you build the contents of source-release.zip and svn tag > > > - do all of the staged jars/zips contain the required LICENSE and > > > NOTICE files > > > - are all of the staged jars signed and the signature verifiable > > > - is the signing key in the project's KEYS file and on a public > > server > > > - does the release pass the TCK > > > > > > -- > > > Albert Lee. > > > > > > > > > -- > Albert Lee. >
