[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13732238#comment-13732238
 ] 

Albert Lee commented on OPENJPA-2419:
-------------------------------------

Scott,

Just curious if you can use the following to override the seq type to 
TYPE_NONTRANSACTIONAL = 1 to use the <non-jta-datasource>

<property name="openjpa.jdbc.DBDictionary" value="(nativeSequenceType=1)"/>

Albert Lee.
                
> Sequence Caching Attempt Failing in JTA Managed Environments with PostgreSQL
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OPENJPA-2419
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2419
>             Project: OpenJPA
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: jdbc
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.2
>         Environment: Fuse (JBoss) ESB 6.0.0-redhat-024 (Karaf 2.3.0)
> OpenJPA 2.2.2
> Apache Aries 1.0.0 (JPA/JTA/JNDI/Blueprint)
>            Reporter: Scott Parkerson
>
> About a year ago, there was a bug (OPENJPA-2196) that I contributed a patch 
> to that deals with cases where OpenJPA's sequence caching cannot be used if 
> the native sequence in the database is not owned by the role connecting to 
> the database. This patch was included in OpenJPA 2.2.2.
> Since then, I've started using JTA-managed transactions in my container (the 
> container being JBoss Fuse ESB, using Aries JPA/JNDI/JTA), and have hit the 
> following snags with my previous fix:
> 1. When the attempt to ALTER SEQUENCE ... INCREMENT BY fails, it basically 
> hoses the entire transaction, causing the next thing (which is to get the 
> next value in the sequence) to fail because the transaction is now invalid 
> and must be rolled back.
> 2. Trying to work around this using either ConnectionFactory2Name or the 
> non-jta-data-source configuration items in my persistence.xml file seems to 
> never matter, as ALL native sequences in OpenJPA are of type TYPE_CONTIGUOUS, 
> and thus it will always choose the managed (jta-data-source or 
> ConnectionFactoryName) methods to attempt to modify the sequence. I cannot 
> see where it attempts to suspend the transaction, either.
> Perhaps there is a workaround, but I cannot see it. Does anyone else have any 
> ideas on what could be done to make this work?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to