[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13870562#comment-13870562
 ] 

Piotr Klimczak edited comment on OPENJPA-2422 at 1/14/14 9:34 AM:
------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi Rick!

Sorry for late answer.
I have faced same problem in another project so I am back.

Here is my persistence.xml (very simple)
{code:xml}
<persistence xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence"; 
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence 
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/persistence_2_0.xsd"; version="2.0">
    <persistence-unit name="emir-persistence" transaction-type="JTA">
        <class>pl.com.bgk.smx.X</class>
        <class>pl.com.bgk.smx.X</class>

        <exclude-unlisted-classes>true</exclude-unlisted-classes>
        <properties>
            <property name="openjpa.DynamicEnhancementAgent" value="false" />
            <property name="openjpa.RuntimeUnenhancedClasses" 
value="unsupported" />
            <property name="openjpa.Multithreaded" value="true" />
            <property name="openjpa.jdbc.MappingDefaults" 
value="ForeignKeyDeleteAction=restrict, JoinForeignKeyDeleteAction=restrict" />
            <property name="openjpa.LockManager" 
value="pessimistic(VersionCheckOnReadLock=true,VersionUpdateOnWriteLock=true)" 
/>
            <property name="openjpa.Log" value="slf4j" />
            <property name="openjpa.ConnectionFactoryProperties" 
value="PrintParameters=true" />
            <property name="openjpa.weaving" value="false" />
        </properties>
    </persistence-unit>

</persistence>
{code}

Adding "openjpa.MetadataRepository=Preload=true" property has solved the 
problem.
Please consider making this property and it's value a default for openjpa. It 
will save other people time and will make openjpa even more user friendly :)

So thank you very much!

Greetings,
Piotr


was (Author: nannou9):
Hi Rick!

Sorry for late answer.
I have faced same problem in another project so I am back.

Here is my persistence.xml (very simple)
{code:xml}
<persistence xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence"; 
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence 
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/persistence_2_0.xsd"; version="2.0">
    <persistence-unit name="emir-persistence" transaction-type="JTA">
        <class>pl.com.bgk.smx.X</class>
        <class>pl.com.bgk.smx.X</class>

        <exclude-unlisted-classes>true</exclude-unlisted-classes>
        <properties>
            <property name="openjpa.DynamicEnhancementAgent" value="false" />
            <property name="openjpa.RuntimeUnenhancedClasses" 
value="unsupported" />
            <property name="openjpa.Multithreaded" value="true" />
            <property name="openjpa.jdbc.MappingDefaults" 
value="ForeignKeyDeleteAction=restrict, JoinForeignKeyDeleteAction=restrict" />
            <property name="openjpa.LockManager" 
value="pessimistic(VersionCheckOnReadLock=true,VersionUpdateOnWriteLock=true)" 
/>
            <property name="openjpa.Log" value="slf4j" />
            <property name="openjpa.ConnectionFactoryProperties" 
value="PrintParameters=true" />
            <property name="openjpa.weaving" value="false" />
        </properties>
    </persistence-unit>

</persistence>
{code}

Adding "openjpa.MetadataRepository=Preload=true" property has solved the 
problem.
So thank you very much!

> ClassMapping and it's strategy will never get initialized due to some 
> synchronizatin/wrong initializaion order problems
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OPENJPA-2422
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2422
>             Project: OpenJPA
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: jpa, kernel
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.0, 2.2.1, 2.2.2
>         Environment: Apache ServiceMix 4.5.2
>            Reporter: Piotr Klimczak
>            Priority: Blocker
>              Labels: ClassCastException, ManyToOne, OneToMany, synchronization
>         Attachments: OPENJPA-2422.ResolveClassMetaData.trace, 
> OPENJPA-2422.ResolveMetaDataRepository.trace
>
>
> After I have switched my software to ServiceMix 4.5.2 I have faced very 
> strange blocking issue.
> I have bidirection relation: OneToMany and ManyToOne that was working fine 
> before switching to ServiceMix 4.5.2. 
> After switching to ServiceMix 4.5.2 i am getting this Exception:
> {code}
> Caused by: java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.openjpa.util.LongId 
> cannot be cast to XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.PARENT
>         at 
> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.CHILD.pcReplaceField(CHILD.java)[227:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:4.0.1.SNAPSHOT]
>         at 
> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.StateManagerImpl.replaceField(StateManagerImpl.java:3213)
>         at 
> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.StateManagerImpl.storeObjectField(StateManagerImpl.java:2643)
>         at 
> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.StateManagerImpl.storeObject(StateManagerImpl.java:2633)
>         at 
> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.kernel.JDBCStoreManager.setMappedBy(JDBCStoreManager.java:478)
>         at 
> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.kernel.JDBCStoreManager.initializeState(JDBCStoreManager.java:404)
>         at 
> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.kernel.JDBCStoreManager.initialize(JDBCStoreManager.java:306)
>         at 
> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.DelegatingStoreManager.initialize(DelegatingStoreManager.java:112)
>         at 
> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.ROPStoreManager.initialize(ROPStoreManager.java:57)
>         at 
> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.BrokerImpl.initialize(BrokerImpl.java:1046)
>         at org.apache.openjpa.kernel.BrokerImpl.find(BrokerImpl.java:1004)
>         ... 133 more
> {code}
> As I have done some debugging, it looks like as some synchronization problems 
> in OpenJPA.
> I'm getting this exception, because ClassMappings are constructed and putted 
> into MODE_META state, before MetaDataRepository that owns them reaches 
> MODE_MAPPING_INIT. So then when MetaDataRepository reaches MODE_MAPPING_INIT 
> state, all ClassMappings are already in MODE_META state and will never be 
> putted into MODE_MAPPING_INIT state as implemented in resolve method in 
> MetaDataRepository:
> {code}
>     /**
>      * Resolve the given metadata if needed. There are three goals:
>      * <ol>
>      * <li>Make sure no unresolved metadata gets back to the client.</li>
>      * <li>Avoid infinite reentrant calls for mutually-dependent metadatas by 
> allowing unresolved
>      * metadata to be returned to other metadatas.</li>
>      * <li>Always make sure the superclass metadata is resolved before the 
> subclass metadata so that
>      * the subclass can access the super's list of fields.</li>
>      * </ol>
>      * Note that the code calling this method is synchronized, so this method 
> doesn't have to be.
>      */
>     private void resolve(ClassMetaData meta) {
>         // return anything that has its metadata resolved, because that means
>         // it is either fully resolved or must at least be in the process of
>         // resolving mapping, etc since we do that right after meta resolve
>         if (meta == null || _resMode == MODE_NONE || (meta.getResolve() & 
> MODE_META) != 0)
>             return;
> {code}
> So it makes ClassMapping's strategy impossible to initialize, once it reaches 
> MODE_META state.
> Due to above problem for example the RelationFieldStrategy will never get 
> initialized, so then the FieldMetadata has _intermediate filed set to false 
> which causes OpenJPA to set a LongId value to the field of type PARENT.
> In my case, this is a blocker.
> Unfortunately i am not able to write a testcase for this bug due to both: do 
> not have a time for this and scenerio is way too complex- multithreaded app.
> In my case problem occurs in aprox 95% app starts.
> Tested on versions 2.2.2, 2.2.0, so same problems probably occurs on 2.2.1.
> All test has been made with ServiceMix 4.5.2.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Reply via email to