Hum, not easy then. Creating a 2.3.1 with ASM 5 to support java 8 is quite a significant change to just change the latest digit, isn't it? >From OpenJPA point of view, it's just a dep update with some minor changes as far as I understood, but I would maybe increment the minor digit instead.
Anyway, I agree with Romain. We can still fork in order to remain Java EE 6 compliant but of course, il would prefer to stick with Apache OpenJPA project. JLouis 2014-05-30 21:01 GMT+02:00 Kevin Sutter <[email protected]>: > > Would be awesome to have a 2.4.0 still Java EE 6 compliant, which is > mainly > a maintenant release and target Java EE 7 (ie. JPA 2.1) for a 2.5.0 or 3.0, > > The 2.3.x stream is for JPA 2.0 level of functionality as well as Java 6. > Any additional development and maintenance for JPA 2.0 and Java 6 should be > targetted for this 2.3.x service stream. > > The 2.4.0 (trunk) stream was meant for JPA 2.1 and Java 7. This is the > main stream for new development. > > > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Side note, we are WebProfile 1.0 (Java EE 6) so we cannot embedded Java > EE > > 7 API (because it's checked in the certification tests). > > Would be awesome to have a 2.4.0 still Java EE 6 compliant, which is > mainly > > a maintenant release and target Java EE 7 (ie. JPA 2.1) for a 2.5.0 or > 3.0, > > dunno. > > > > Jean-Louis > > > > > > 2014-05-30 17:27 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]>: > > > > > We are waiting for the 2.4.0 to support Java 8. > > > That's the only library missing to release (OpenWebBeans, XBean have > been > > > released last week). > > > > > > Jean-Louis > > > > > > > > > 2014-05-30 16:58 GMT+02:00 Kevin Sutter <[email protected]>: > > > > > > Hi Romain, > > >> I can't speak for everybody on our dev list, but I don't have the > cycles > > >> to > > >> create an OpenJPA release just for TomEE. It sounds like we might > need > > >> more TomEE developers with OpenJPA karma to help out in this regard... > > >> Hint, hint... :-) > > >> > > >> Just curious, which stream are you looking for a release from? The > > 2.3.x > > >> service stream, or the 2.4.0 trunk stream? If the latter, then you > > >> realize > > >> that this has been moved to require Java 7 in preparation for JPA 2.1 > > and > > >> the rest of Java EE? Does that matter to you? If you are looking > for a > > >> 2.3.x release, then I still have two outstanding Infra JIRAs for doing > > the > > >> nightly code and doc builds... > > >> > > >> Sorry that I can't be of more help, but we've had a few OpenJPA > > developers > > >> move onto other "day jobs" and their time on OpenJPA has dropped off > > >> considerably... Just too much work for the people left... > > >> > > >> Kevin > > >> > > >> > > >> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > >> [email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > Hi guys > > >> > > > >> > we asked few weeks ago if we could hope a release for tomee one and > > you > > >> > said us to fork but as we took a bit more time to prepare the > release > > as > > >> > expected I ask again the question hoping something changed: do you > > >> think an > > >> > openjpa release is close? > > >> > > > >> > Our constraints are to let tomee be out in june so openjpa release > > >> should > > >> > be on vote next week (+- few days). > > >> > > > >> > wdyt? > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Romain Manni-Bucau > > >> > Twitter: @rmannibucau > > >> > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > > >> > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > > >> > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Jean-Louis > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Jean-Louis > > > -- Jean-Louis
