[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
brian yoder updated OPENJPA-2566:
---------------------------------
Comment: was deleted
(was: It would seem that if I wrap my jpaEM with a try, catch, finally - and
call the em.close() in the finally I don't get a leak. However since I am
using EJB 3x with an EntityManager injection I wonder why close must be called
for every method invocation if the EM is reused by the EJB.
That said I think it's worth a look into the OpenJPA codebase to see why
OpenJPAPersistance.cast(em) is causing a leak, and has to be manually closed at
the end of the use of the casted EM. I suspect that the EM is calling
em.getDelegate(), and possibly that is part of the mystery here. If this is a
shared deligate, could that possibly explain the leak?
For my Glassfish J2EE server the em is actually this class:
com.sun.enterprise.container.common.impl.EntityManagerWrapper
public static OpenJPAEntityManager cast(EntityManager em) {
if (em instanceof OpenJPAEntityManager)
return (OpenJPAEntityManager) em;
return (OpenJPAEntityManager) em.getDelegate();
}
)
> Memory leak when using OpenJPAPersistence.cast(em)?
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OPENJPA-2566
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2566
> Project: OpenJPA
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.3.1
> Reporter: brian yoder
> Attachments: screen shot OOM.jpg
>
>
> I have noticed a memory leak when using the following code on Glassfish J2EE
> server 3.1, however suspect the issue is not related to Glassfish.
> OpenJPAEntityManager kem = OpenJPAPersistence.cast(emNoTran);
> kem.getFetchPlan().addFetchGroup("contactDetails");
> It seems the code causes a huge memory leak with JDBCBrokerFactory growing
> its MapBackedSet, ConcurrentHashMap.
> Any ideas why this would be? I am calling the above code over-and-over again
> for each EJB method invocation, which it was my understanding it is only good
> for the current EM transaction. Perhaps I have misunderstood.
> My Requirement is to set the fetch group only for the current transaction,
> such that lazy fields for a particular entity get loaded up front, but only
> within this call from the EJB.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
