[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14296134#comment-14296134
]
brian yoder commented on OPENJPA-2566:
--------------------------------------
This seems to also be related to using a NON_TRANSACTIONAL EntityManager (i.e.
TransactionAttributeType.NOT_SUPPORTED), leak doesn't occur when using
transactional EM. So my guess is that because the EM is non transactional the
cleanup isn't working proper, so it would seem this is bug in Glassfish and I
will file with them.
Rick - thanks for your help.
> Memory leak when using OpenJPAPersistence.cast(em)?
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OPENJPA-2566
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2566
> Project: OpenJPA
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.3.1
> Reporter: brian yoder
> Attachments: screen shot OOM.jpg
>
>
> I have noticed a memory leak when using the following code on Glassfish J2EE
> server 3.1, however suspect the issue is not related to Glassfish.
> OpenJPAEntityManager kem = OpenJPAPersistence.cast(emNoTran);
> kem.getFetchPlan().addFetchGroup("contactDetails");
> It seems the code causes a huge memory leak with JDBCBrokerFactory growing
> its MapBackedSet, ConcurrentHashMap.
> Any ideas why this would be? I am calling the above code over-and-over again
> for each EJB method invocation, which it was my understanding it is only good
> for the current EM transaction. Perhaps I have misunderstood.
> My Requirement is to set the fetch group only for the current transaction,
> such that lazy fields for a particular entity get loaded up front, but only
> within this call from the EJB.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
