Looks like it might have pulled in my changes after all, but looking at the
errors:

javadoc: warning - Error fetching URL:
http://commons.apache.org/collections/api-release/

/Users/jgrassel/Documents/Development/JPA/OpenJPA/2.2.x/openjpa-lib/src/main/java/org/apache/openjpa/lib/ant/AbstractTask.java:75:
warning: no @param for haltOnError

    public void setHaltOnError(boolean haltOnError) {


I did notice that 2.2.x is running with java 8:

 Command line was: /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-oracle/jre/../bin/javadoc
-J-Xmx1024m @options

While trunk appears to be running with java 7 (
https://ci.apache.org/builders/openjpa-trunk-docs/builds/338/steps/compile/logs/stdio
):

JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-amd64

After a bit of searching, it sounds like Java 8 made checking more
stricter, which the 2.2.x build is running afoul of.  Is there any chance
of getting the 2.2.x doc build to run with java 7 (which is what I used to
pass my local sandbox, switching to Java 8 my sandbox fails the same way as
the nightly build.)

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Jody Grassel <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ok, so I had checked in 1749783, which maven completed successfully in my
> local sandbox.  However, it looks like last night's build (
> https://ci.apache.org/builders/openjpa-2.2.x-docs/builds/325 ) picked up
> a mid-may revision instead of the latest revision (that integrated to
> trunk, no less, not 2.2.x.)  Any suggestions on how to force it to pick up
> the new 2.2.x track?
>
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Jody Grassel <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Locally, the changes I posted to OPENJPA-2645 allow my maven build to
>> complete successfully.  By in large, most of the changes have been poached
>> from trunk, though I had to force the use of newer maven plugins on some
>> occasions (such as maven-assembly-plugin).  Does anyone have any objections
>> to the proposed patch?
>>
>> Patch can be tested by applying, and then executing at the branch root:
>> mvn -U clean site install -DskipTests -Pjavadoc-profile,docbook-profile
>>
>
>

Reply via email to