[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16682576#comment-16682576
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-2731:
----------------------------------------
Jody, I think this did only hit openjpa-2.2.x, right?
Because in 3.0.x and 2.4.x the PostgresDictionary doesn't have any
{{setBoolean}} method.
Probably the original BooleanRepresentation patch did not get fully merged back
to 2.2.x?
Can we close this ticket as resolved in 2.2.3 or so?
> Problems with Boolean Representation with Postgres
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OPENJPA-2731
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2731
> Project: OpenJPA
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: jdbc
> Affects Versions: 2.2.2
> Reporter: Jody Grassel
> Assignee: Jody Grassel
> Priority: Major
> Labels: easyfix
> Fix For: 2.2.3
>
> Attachments: patch_2.2.x.txt
>
>
> OPENJPA-2558 addressed, in general, boolean representations on the database
> (native Boolean column types, as an int(0,1), as a string, as a char, etc),
> but had coverage gaps with respect to the supported platforms. Postgres is
> one of those platforms. Its dictionary class still overrode setBoolean(),
> but did not equally override getBoolean() which introduced a conflict.
> I'm proposing an update which removes the setBoolean() method from the
> Postgres dbdictionary, as well as adding the ability for a database platform
> to declare a default boolean representation type (preserving the INT10
> default, but setting Postgres' to BooleanRepresentation in order to match
> what the schemagenerator for postgres creates).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)