Not sure I have the full vision but think we have a partial support of JPA DDL ( https://github.com/apache/openjpa/commit/af8ea38f87a778401ca1c679f7087d3a0d5a52cc) and the stored procedure support but not sure we have much more except trivial things like result stream support (through getResultList().stream() and not cursors)
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le lun. 7 janv. 2019 à 11:47, Francesco Chicchiriccò <ilgro...@apache.org> a écrit : > On 07/01/19 11:45, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > Hi Francesco, > > > > I will not have much time these days to help very actively but i'd expose > > it the other way around, more roadmap oriented: > > > > OpenJPA 3.0.0: provides stored procedure support of JPA 2.1 etc... > > > > cause structurally we are more about adding features one by one than > saying > > "we just miss X and Y" for now - which is fine IMHO but just trying to > > explain why we must not reference ourself to JPA 2.2 completeness but > more > > on a kind of timeline. > > I understand, that's fine; I would still need to fill up the statements > above for both 3.0.0 and 3.0.1: would you be able to provide those? > > Regards. > > > Le lun. 7 janv. 2019 à 11:43, Francesco Chicchiriccò < > ilgro...@apache.org> > > a écrit : > > > >> Hi all, > >> a recent conversation on Twitter [1] with Oliver Drotbohm, Spring Data > >> project lead, highlighted the need to clarify what is the JPA spec level > >> implemented by the various OpenJPA releases; for such a purpose, [2] was > >> opened. > >> > >> I personally believe it is quite important to timely react, and I also > >> offer my availability to align the various docs, if no one else steps > >> in; for such a purpose, however, I would really appreciate some kind of > >> draft statements like as follows: > >> > >> * OpenJPA 2.x - fully implements JPA 2.0 specs, pass JPA TCK > >> * OpenJPA 3.0.0 - depends on JPA 2.1 specs, JPA TCK not available at > >> release time - missing JPA 2.1 features: A,B,C... > >> * OpenJPA 3.0.1 - not released yet, depends on JPA 2.2 specs, JPA TCK > >> compliance not yet verified - missing JPA 2.2 features: D,E,F... > >> > >> WDYT? > >> Regards. > >> > >> [1] https://twitter.com/odrotbohm/status/1081713555290972160 > >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2765 > > -- > Francesco Chicchiriccò > > Tirasa - Open Source Excellence > http://www.tirasa.net/ > > Member at The Apache Software Foundation > Syncope, Cocoon, Olingo, CXF, OpenJPA, PonyMail > http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/ > >
