On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 06:19:35PM -0400, Schuyler Erle wrote: > On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 14:47 -0600, Tim Schaub wrote: > > > > In case it's not clear from all my trac spam, Firebug Lite provides very > > non-obtrusive, optional, debugging functionality. > > > > It will *never* get built into a single file version. The only > > additional OpenLayers code is in OpenLayers.Console [1]. > > > > If someone doesn't have it, nothing happens. The only time it does > > anything is if the firebug.js script is included before the > > OpenLayers.js in an application. When this condition is met, any calls > > to OpenLayers.Console.log, .warn, .error, or others will show up in a > > Firebug like console. > > I think this is a great feature. I guess my question is: Do we want to > ship Firebug Lite *with* OpenLayers? or merely provide functionality > they can go and get separately?
I don't see any reason not to ship it. It doesn't have to be deployed if you're doing production, and when you're not, it's uber-handy. Regards, -- Christopher Schmidt MetaCarta _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
