I would like to refer us all to the wise, wise words of Karl Fogel: http://producingoss.com/en/mailing-lists.html#reply-to
On 7/16/07, Tim Schaub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Christopher Schmidt wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 12:21:34PM -0500, Lance Dyas wrote: > >> Because the way the list is setup my mail client says the reply to is > >> just one user... > > > > Yes. This behavior is intentional. Using the "Reply-to-List" feature of > > your mail client will help here, if your client has one. If it does not, > > I'm sorry that it does not. > > > > In general, I feel more comfortable with responses accidentally not > > going to the list than I do with responses meant for a single person > > accidentally going to the list. > > > > Regards, > > I agree with Lance here. Personally, I'd like it if subscribers > addresses were never exposed. This is a list - not a tea party. > > I get tired of ditching addresses because folks include a personal > address in the text of the reply and spam bots pick it up. > > I think if people want personal communication, they should use different > means to get addresses and initiate a conversation. If you have an > issue, you address it to the list. If you want to respond to an issue, > you address it to the list. A person might also want to respond to an > issue without opening themselves up to unsolicited personal responses. > > (And though I wish "get a new browser" were a valid solution at times, I > don't think "get a new email client" is a good solution here.) > > Just another opinion. > Tim > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev > _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
