Cameron Shorter wrote: > I guess there are different levels of importance for things that are > voted on. > For a major design change, or large functionality addition, where > someone is prepared to write up a RFQ to describe it, the extra effort > to record the decision at the bottom of the RFQ is relatively minor. Eg: > "Passed by PSC vote" or "Blocked by Joe Blogs during PSC vote who said > ...". I'm happy with this. > It would be more effort to fill in a table ticking off the votes for the > 15 or so PSC members. While I can see value in this, I don't think the > value outweighs the annoyance factor this will introduce. >
For what it's worth, for MapServer, we include a "Voting History" section at the end of each RFC and fill it as follows... takes only a few minutes and gives all the info that we need for the posterity: e.g. http://mapserver.gis.umn.edu/development/rfc/ms-rfc-31#voting-history Voting history +1 from SteveL, SteveW, TomK, FrankW, AssefaY, PericlesN +0 from JeffM > > For minor PSC votes, like "should we release or not", I'm not sure that > this warrants the effort of transcribing from email to wiki table. We do not do much to archive minor PSC votes either. Daniel -- Daniel Morissette http://www.mapgears.com/ _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
