Chris, On 10/15/07, Christopher Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think that it would be acceptable to not worry about OpenLayers.Style > until it makes it into trunk: we're going to have to do a lot of > churn/transition once it's in
>From my point of view, there is only one open question for the sldRenderer, which I posted to the list earlier today. Once the "apply-style magic" is implemented, I would consider the sldRenderer sandbox ready for review and putting it into trunk after that. Since there are only two places in existing code that are affected by the sldRenderer, I dont't think that there would be too much churn to do. >, and I don't mind having KML development > go the existing path until it gets in, just so we don't have > cross-sandbox development (which I hate merging). This is the one thing. But the other thing is that the OpenLayers.Style class is a good representation for any kind of style information retreived from xml or elsewhere. And IMO it would be a shame if such neat things would have to be developed twice. Regards, Andreas. _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
