Hi, On Nov 22, 2007 1:24 PM, Christopher Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 10:31:12AM +0100, Andreas Hocevar wrote: > > On Nov 21, 2007 9:31 PM, OpenLayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > (In [5244]) Mark drawFeature as stable (Closes #1059) > > > > I would reconsider that, especially since no one has obviously taken > > notice of my posting a few days ago > > (http://www.nabble.com/Features,-Styling-and-Rendering-t4823880.html). > However, I think that if we do go the route you have suggested: that is, > passing a 'key' into drawFeature instead of a style object, we should > *still* maintain the existing capability. Determining whether we were > passed a key or an object is easy (typeof style == "string"), and I have > no problems *extending* the existing API once we have it.
Ok, that sounds like a solution. This typeof check is hopefully inexpensive, because it will be made every time we render a fetature. > I disagree: we just have to be more cautious :) Extensions of the API > are fine, and I think that this one is a cost we should be prepared to > take on. If it becomes a problem, I'll help accomodate for it in your > developments. Fine, then I'll bury my concerns :-). Closed #1059 again. Regards, Andreas. _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
