Don't know how the meeting went, but I'll throw in my thoughts. I like the idea that OpenLayers supports the reading and writing of various vector formats (to and from our vector feature model). It also makes sense to me that OpenLayers should be able to serialize the map state. We've got a solid WMC parser now, so we can read and write Web Map Context documents. When OWS Context is settled, we can add in a parser for OWS Context.
Lorenzo already has put together WMS capabilities parsing. I have written a parser to do the same. I think these can be brought in to the trunk in the near future. All this is pretty straightforward and doesn't make for very exciting SoC material (in my mind). If anybody is proposing a project that would do WMC parsing but would not use the OpenLayers.Format.WMC, then I don't think this project belongs as an OpenLayers SoC project. Same goes for WMS Capabilities parsing. If you're going be doing something different with WMS Capabilities than creating a list of layers usable by OpenLayers, then I don't really see the point in having this be an OpenLayers SoC project. Perhaps all that is not very relevant, as I didn't read the MapBuilder logs or any log of an #openlayers chat. Just my opinion. Tim Lorenzo Becchi wrote: > I'm nobody from the PSC, so I don't know how it has been decided to > merge Mapbuilder Ideas with OL's ones. > > From one side I found it cool to work on a WebMapping stack where OL is > used as JS mapping library. So programmers from different projects, as > Mapbuilder, as Mapguide-Fusion, CAmp2Camp, ecc. can share their common > effort in common libs. > > the question: > is, merging MapBuilder SoC Ideas, a good idea in matter of common > interest between all contributing projects? > > my very poor 0.02 euro > > Lorenzo > > > > Lorenzo Becchi wrote: >> Thanks Roald, >> sadly I can't be there tomorrow. >> It's a prohibitive time window for me all the week. >> >> ciao >> Lorenzo >> >> >> >> Roald de Wit wrote: >> >>> Hi Lorenzo, >>> >>> On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 23:24 +0100, Lorenzo Becchi wrote: >>> >>> >>>> I've just seen I've lost the meeting. sorry >>>> >>>> >>> The meeting is tomorrow, not today, so you can still make it! I think >>> something went wrong with the link provided (but the times in the email >>> are the correct ones). >>> >>> These should be the correct dates and times (Cameron, please correct me >>> if I'm wrong): >>> >>> Place Time >>> Sydney Tue 06:00 >>> Amsterdam (Central European Time) Mon 20:00 >>> New York (Eastern Standard Time) Mon 14:00 >>> Los Angeles (Western Standard Time) Mon 11:00 >>> Greenwich Mean Time Mon 19:00 >>> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2008&month=3&day=17&hour=19&min=0&sec=0&p1=240&p2=16&p3=179&p4=137 >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Roald >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev >> > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev > > !DSPAM:4033,47e1ba8c21431804284693! > _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
