On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 1:46 AM, Tim Schaub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey- > > Some may have already seen the proposal for new vector layer behavior. > http://trac.openlayers.org/wiki/Proposal/VectorBehavior > > This week, I'll be working on implementing a bit of this new design. > I'm focussed on an AtomPub protocol, an Atom format, and a somewhat > smartish BBOX strategy.
Great! I've also started working on these Protocol ideas. I even created a elemoine/protocol sandbox for that. So I'm definitely very interested in collaborating on this. I went over your code and here are preliminary comments: The protocol subclasses have a layer property. Is this a temporary thing or do you think of leaving this as is? In my opinion, a protocol should be independent of the layer. For example you may want to use a protocol just to read features and do things with these features that aren't related to a layer (e.g. stash these features in a grid). As I understand it, the layer is used as a common object for accessing the strategy and the format. Don't you think we could make things more separate? -- Eric _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
