On Jun 16, 2010, at 3:39 AM, ext Pierre Giraud wrote: > I think I'm in favor on having a 3.0 and starting with a "one place / > many developpers" coding.
Not sure I understand here: the two ideas that seem to be conflicting are: * Branch now, have an IRC meeting to discuss what our plans are, then use the next 2 months to take care of small things (like removing WMS.Untiled, MouseToolbar, etc.) before the conference, and do the 'hard stuff' (like rewrites of map.moveTo, etc.) during the conference. * Use time during code sprint/FOSS4G to discuss our plans for 3.0 face to face, and come up with a solid plan during the code sprint. (Practically speaking, I expect that we'd spend a whole day talking, and not get a whole lot done.) Then follow up with coding after FOSS4G, presumably. Which one are you in favor of? > If I remember well, a while ago, camptocamp started to think about > looking for sponsors in order to organize a code sprint week with a > focus on building a 3.0 version. It is unlikely that I will be able to participate in any code sprint that is not during FOSS4G. Though perhaps I attach too much importance to my role in the project at this point, and I should just plan on stepping back from participating to allow the current contributors to control the direction of 3.0. Regards, -- Christopher Schmidt Nokia _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list Dev@openlayers.org http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
