ok

On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 12:33 PM, [email protected] <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes it is still beta.
> There is a list of open "todos"
>
> http://markmail.org/message/zdey6pnm7ieixbyy
>
> + the issues with the server Entity and the username and password.
>
> It is ready for testing, but develpment is not even finished.
>
> So it is simply not meant for production, or if used in production you
> should be aware that there are a couple of open issues to solve. So thats
> beta.
>
> Sebastian
>
>
> Am 13.03.2013 15:33 schrieb "Maxim Solodovnik" <[email protected]>:
>
> I'll ask Irina/Yuliya to review doc for cluster.
>> Do you think we still need to mention cluster is in beta in release notes?
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:25 AM, [email protected] <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>
>>> your use case does not really make sense.
>>> You should not login to different servers initially.
>>>
>>> You should login to the same server initially. Then also the overallChat
>>> will work as epxected.
>>>
>>> The server will redirect you for the conference room to the appropriate
>>> server automatically. But it is not intend to have 10 servers and you use
>>> randomly one for your initial request.
>>>
>>> We might extend that to this later, however currently you have to use
>>> the same server initially.
>>>
>>> I think I have written down that in my docs for Denis but it somehow did
>>> find its way to
>>> http://openmeetings.apache.org/Clustering.html
>>>  I think Denis had initially the same issue.
>>>
>>> Your issue is still valid but in another context:
>>> Once the user is redirected to a conference room, he potentially could
>>> receive a currently in use streamId.
>>> I am not sure if that can become a problem when you are in the
>>> conference room but it will require further thinking, review and testing.
>>>
>>> Sebastian
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/3/12 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>> Hello Sebastian,
>>>>
>>>> while testing cluster I found an issue:
>>>>
>>>> Steps:
>>>> 1) configure 2 servers to work in cluster mode (
>>>> http://openmeetings.apache.org/Clustering.html)
>>>> 2) start both servers
>>>> 3) login to each server with different users
>>>> Result: one of the servers has following Exception in the logs:
>>>>
>>>> DEBUG 03-12 11:12:40.162 ScopeApplicationAdapter.java 295262 463
>>>> org.apache.openmeetings.remote.red5.ScopeApplicationAdapter
>>>> [NioProcessor-2] - -----------  getPublicSID
>>>> ERROR 03-12 11:12:40.214 SessionManager.java 295314 129
>>>> org.apache.openmeetings.session.SessionManager [NioProcessor-2] -
>>>> [getClientByStreamId]
>>>> java.lang.RuntimeException: more then one client was found streamId 0
>>>> server Server [id=1, name=master-105, address=192.168.72.105, port=5080,
>>>> user=admin, pass=12345, protocol=http, active=true, webapp=openmeetings,
>>>> deleted=false]
>>>>         at
>>>> org.apache.openmeetings.data.conference.dao.ClientDao.getClientByServerAndStreamId(ClientDao.java:115)
>>>> ~[openmeetings-2.1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:na]
>>>>
>>>> I guess this is because streamid is not unique anymore (both client
>>>> just entered to the different red5 instances have streamId == 0)
>>>> From the user perspective rtmp connection get dropped and client
>>>> switched to RTMPT (Try 1)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Room chat works as expected (the fact messages are not stored in the DB
>>>> is not so important until everybody left the room, after that room can be
>>>> opened on another server by auto-balancer)
>>>>
>>>> According to the Administration->Connections tab connection dropped
>>>> because of issue above still listed as active .....
>>>>
>>>> As you have mentioned before global chat is not working in this case.
>>>> But as you also have mentioned this limitation can be bypassed if "master"
>>>> server will be used as entry point by OM users)
>>>>
>>>> I believe current cluster implementation has same limitations as
>>>> previous version, but better implemented.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> WBR
>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sebastian Wagner
>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>>> http://www.webbase-design.de
>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> WBR
>> Maxim aka solomax
>>
>


-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Reply via email to